http://stylec.yuku.com/topic/6065/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:08:12 GMT Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:11:28 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://stylec.yuku.com/topic/6065/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ http://stylec.yuku.com/reply/89691/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html#reply-89691 cinemarts wrote:

---

Anyone seen RIP! A REMIX MANIFESTO yet? If not, go to http://www.opensourcecinema.org/project/rip2.0

]]> feeds@yuku.com (Hazard) http://stylec.yuku.com/sreply/89691 Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:11:28 GMT http://stylec.yuku.com/reply/89626/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html#reply-89626 feeds@yuku.com (Ari Richards) http://stylec.yuku.com/sreply/89626 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:46:13 GMT http://stylec.yuku.com/reply/89624/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html#reply-89624 feeds@yuku.com (cinemarts) http://stylec.yuku.com/sreply/89624 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:34:22 GMT http://stylec.yuku.com/reply/89585/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html#reply-89585
And looking at the images, which are already iconic and well-known to begin with, I can only wonder what this guy was smoking: "By... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (rumble) http://stylec.yuku.com/sreply/89585 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:41:14 GMT http://stylec.yuku.com/reply/89534/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html#reply-89534 Bombi :

http://www.richardgoodallgallery.com/contemporaryart/images/bombiBA.jpeg

Can't remember how many of them are availible, it was numbered, people either really like it or despise it, I was with a lady who hated it for what it was and what it stood... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (lackery) http://stylec.yuku.com/sreply/89534 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:50:10 GMT http://stylec.yuku.com/reply/89533/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html#reply-89533
I didn't know anything about Fairey at the time but had seen the Obey imprint around. Later I found out about the controversy surrounding his work and his appropriation of others' images. This... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (posteropolis) http://stylec.yuku.com/sreply/89533 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:43:22 GMT http://stylec.yuku.com/reply/89532/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html#reply-89532 feeds@yuku.com (jrosen) http://stylec.yuku.com/sreply/89532 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:26:35 GMT http://stylec.yuku.com/reply/89531/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html#reply-89531
And as one photographer puts it near the end of the article, "If I italicized 'Moby-Dick,' then would it be my book? I don't know. But I don't... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Bruce) http://stylec.yuku.com/sreply/89531 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:09:12 GMT http://stylec.yuku.com/reply/89530/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html#reply-89530
I'm sure there were many before either of them ]]> feeds@yuku.com (comicart) http://stylec.yuku.com/sreply/89530 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:05:02 GMT http://stylec.yuku.com/reply/89528/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html#reply-89528 comicart wrote:

---

He has used the older imagery as icons to create his newer art and it is a common practice to some degree.

Warhol did it, was he the first? Then you've got Banksy and Damien Hirst both attack the art world, one from inside and the other from outside - both are full of shit though.

Simon ]]> feeds@yuku.com (lackery) http://stylec.yuku.com/sreply/89528 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:57:08 GMT http://stylec.yuku.com/reply/89525/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html#reply-89525 cinemarts wrote:

---

SOMETHING FAMILIAR
That's been around for a while. Somewhere on the web is a counter-argument.

Regardless, I rarely find 'his' work interesting, but I admire his ability to market himself.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (the archie leach experience) http://stylec.yuku.com/sreply/89525 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:36:57 GMT http://stylec.yuku.com/reply/89523/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html#reply-89523 CSM wrote:

---

Definitely an interesting read. The only problem I see with it is the fact he has now copyrighted images that were never his to begin with for profit.

If this wasn't the case, I would have no problem with him using these images and altering them to his needs as graffiti for dissemination to a MUCH wider audience... in the art world we don't exactly say it that way CSM.

He... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (comicart) http://stylec.yuku.com/sreply/89523 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:10:59 GMT http://stylec.yuku.com/reply/89522/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html#reply-89522
If this wasn't the case, I would have no problem with him using these images and altering them to his needs as graffiti for dissemination to a MUCH wider audience... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (CSM) http://stylec.yuku.com/sreply/89522 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:40:01 GMT http://stylec.yuku.com/reply/89521/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html#reply-89521 susan ]]> feeds@yuku.com (honeybryder) http://stylec.yuku.com/sreply/89521 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:31:48 GMT http://stylec.yuku.com/topic/6065/t/ART-FOR-ART-S-SAKE-OR-IS-IT-.html SOMETHING FAMILIAR
]]> feeds@yuku.com (cinemarts) http://stylec.yuku.com/topic/6065 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:08:12 GMT